| Path: Home > Projects > R&D > Key Findings > “Can-Do” |
| [Abstract] [Key Findings] [Recommendations] [Output] |
|
Analysing the training and development needs of participating SMEs. | |
|
Addressing the learning and training needs of SMEs and individual employees through credit based unitised provision. | |
|
Motivating employees to take up learning opportunities through credit based provision. | |
|
Providing and developing effective and appropriate ICT supported learning. | |
|
Promoting credit based and ICT learning opportunities with its European partners. |
Partners: UK-University of Derby, Burton College, Derby Tertiary
College, Mackworth College, SE Derbyshire College, High Peak College, Southern
Derbyshire Chamber
EU – IDEC (Gr), ASALMA (Sp), GOIEKI (Sp), COGNOS (D)
|
Visits and discussions with participating companies and with learners; | |
|
Observations of learners; | |
|
Discussion with project staff at each college; | |
|
Review of learning materials; | |
|
Questionnaires to employers; | |
|
Questionnaires to learners. |
The main conclusions of the project are:
|
Training needs analysis effective. Employers found the process and results useful. | |
|
Employers mainly interested in training to meet their own needs. | |
|
Employers clearly motivated to take part in on-line learning. | |
|
Support for learners vital to ensure they complete their learning programmes successfully. | |
|
Need for flexible approach in deciding which methods of support are best for a particular employee. | |
|
Material should be designed to fit a study programme of small chunks of learning. | |
|
Combination of workbook and support clearly effective with a motivated learner. | |
|
E-mail very effective method of tutorial support, but still need face-to-face meeting. | |
|
Integration of different aspects of project essential to ensure smooth flow and maintain interest. Delays and gaps in a programme lead to learners and employers losing interest. | |
|
Many employers do not fully understand benefits and functions of qualifications and credits. | |
|
Exposure to online and flexible approaches to learning changes learners’ preferences to methods and location. | |
|
Learners significantly motivated by working towards qualification. | |
|
Materials development is time consuming and difficult for individual college to carry out quickly in context of other priorities. |
|
Delivery models – each partner had different approach. Recommended that a joint workshop should be held to share experience. | |
|
Learning materials – development of materials requires considerable resources and expertise. Partners should consider joint development. |
| External evaluation report (2001) “Can-Do” Derbyshire ADAPT project. |
Funder: University of Derbyshire for EU ADAPT programme
Duration: May 1999-March 2000
Project Manager: Alan Clarke
Email: alan.clarke@niace.org.uk
Requests for ‘Key Findings’ in other formats, such as large print, are welcome. We would be pleased to consider your request.